Loading…
6
Can we talk about how the 1,000th moon landing post got more traction than the actual anomaly data?
I started logging every conspiracy post in this sub for 6 months and hit 1,000 entries last Tuesday, and 847 of them were about moon landings being faked. The thing is, only 3 of those posts actually linked to source footage or NASA documents, the rest just repeated the same talking points with zero new evidence. If the whole point of this community is debating, why do the posts with real research behind them get buried while the low effort repeats blow up?
1 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In1 Comment
margaret_jackson7319d ago
Only 3 of those posts linked to source footage and that says it all, real research takes effort and gets ignored while lazy repeats win.
-1