Commission deadlines that ignore clay's natural pace are a recipe for disaster

I accepted a rush order for a dozen bowls last year, forcing me to use a heat gun to dry them faster. Every single one developed hairline fractures after the glaze firing, rendering them useless. That waste of time and material convinced me that clients who demand speed over quality don't deserve handmade pottery. True ceramics requires respecting the material's timeline, not imposing artificial ones. I now turn down any job that doesn't allow for proper, unhurried drying cycles.

3 comments

3 Comments

patriciae953h ago

That story about the dozen lost bowls is heartbreaking. Clay really does have its own non-negotiable schedule that you can't rush without consequence. Good on you for setting that boundary with clients now.

flores.simon1h ago

Reading Michael Cardew's writings always stuck with me, where he described clay as a living material that demands respect for its timeline. Forcing the drying process isn't just risky for the artwork, it disregards the energy invested in every stage. That bisque fire Paige mentioned, I recall a study showing it can use up to 30 kilowatt-hours for a medium load, which is substantial. When clients understand that their rush could literally waste enough electricity to run a fridge for a week, they often reconsider. It's about framing the craft in terms of resource stewardship, not just patience. Once you see the numbers, it becomes harder to justify shortcuts that compromise both art and environment.

paige_hunt452h ago

Beyond the immediate loss, consider the environmental toll of rushed ceramic work. Every cracked bowl from forced drying represents wasted clay, water, and kiln energy. Clients often don't realize that a bisque fire alone consumes enough electricity to power a household for hours. Setting boundaries isn't just about art, it's about sustainable practice. When you explain the resource cost, even impatient customers tend to back off.