I finally admitted that "cancel culture" is more complicated than I thought - what side are you on?

Okay so for years I was firmly against cancel culture. Thought it was mob justice ruining people's lives over old tweets or dumb jokes. But then last month my local coffee shop in Austin hired this guy who had a whole history of harassing women online. Customers found out, posted about it, and the shop let him go after 3 days. Some people said that's cancel culture gone too far. Others said it's just accountability. I honestly don't know where the line is anymore. Are we supposed to just let people keep jobs after they've done stuff like that? Or is it really just mob rule? What convinced you one way or the other?

3 comments

3 Comments

valw361mo ago

The line gets blurry when the punishment doesn't match the crime's timeline.

julia_patel1mo ago

But what if the crime itself is ongoing, like fraud that keeps compounding - do we punish for the start date or keep adding to the sentence as the damage grows? That's a whole different kind of blurry.

the_cole24d ago

Hold up, you're saying the punishment should match up with the timeline of the crime? That's wild to think about. Like, you're telling me a judge might have to figure out when the crime started and end its sentence accordingly? @julia_patel brought up a good point about ongoing fraud, but that makes it even harder. The whole thing falls apart if the crime stretches out over years, you know? I mean, are we supposed to track every single bad act like it's a subscription you can cancel? That just sounds like a nightmare for everyone involved, from the lawyers to the victims waiting for some kind of closure.