T
17

Stayed at a dead-end job for 2 years vs quitting with no backup - which is worse?

I was working at a call center in Austin for $15 an hour, taking 40 calls a day from angry people about their phone bills. My gut told me to quit every morning for like 18 months straight, but I was scared of having no income. So I stayed, and it wrecked my confidence and I gained 15 pounds from stress eating. Then my buddy Marcus quit his similar job with nothing lined up, lived on ramen for 4 months, and ended up finding a web design gig that pays twice as much. So I'm wondering, for those of you who've been in this spot, is it smarter to stick it out and save a 6-month cushion before leaving, or take the leap and trust you'll figure it out on the other side? What did you pick and how did it really turn out for you?
2 comments

Log in to join the discussion

Log In
2 Comments
torres.sage
That Marcus story hits close to home. My cousin Sarah did the same thing - quit her retail manager gig with zero savings, crashed on my couch for three months eating nothing but peanut butter sandwiches. She ended up applying for a receptionist job at a vet clinic just to pay bills, and now she's training to be a vet tech making way more. Meanwhile I stayed at a warehouse job way too long, got carpal tunnel, and spent my savings on physical therapy instead of using it as a cushion. Sometimes having that 'emergency fund' mindset just keeps you stuck because you never feel like you have enough. The ramen route sounds rough but at least you're forced to make moves instead of just rotting.
1
ray189
ray18914d ago
The emergency fund trap is real. People get so scared of hitting zero they just stay miserable and call it being responsible. Sarah figured it out the hard way but at least she's on the other side now.
1