Reading order debate: chronological vs publication, my club split in half over it
Our book club in Austin got into a huge fight last month about whether to read the Thursday Murder Club series in order or just jump in with the newest one. I picked chronological because I'm a stickler for spoilers, but four members wanted to skip straight to the latest book so we could discuss something fresh. So we made a deal: I read the first two, they read the newest, then we met and compared notes. Honestly, it was a mess. The skip-ahead folks kept referencing characters I didn't know, and I was explaining plot threads they'd missed from earlier books. We spent half the meeting just trying to align our timelines. Has anyone else ever run a split reading plan like that, or do you always enforce a strict order? I'm wondering if we should just do two separate meetings next time so nobody feels left out.