Old timer vs modern diagnostics debate got me thinking
I had a conversation at the TA in Flagstaff last week with a guy who's been turning wrenches since the 70s. He swears by the old school methods like using a stethoscope and timing light instead of plugging in a laptop. I told him I get results faster with my scanner and live data. He said, "You're just reading codes, not understanding the engine." That actually hit me because half the time I'm swapping parts based on what the computer says, not what I feel or hear. But on the other hand, these new engines are so computer controlled that you kind of need the digital stuff. So I'm wondering, which side do you guys lean on when a truck comes in with a weird driveability issue?